I couldn't help but notice a few thing during this most recent 'Celebrity Aprentice,' where the finalists came down to Holly Robertson Peete's, an Bret Michels.
I couldn't help but wonder (or notice) about how speedy Bret's recovery from his brain hemmorrage was. And then the 'mini stroke.' My father had a stroke, after which the left side of his body was completely paralyzed. So I find it questionable that Michaels's reps say (while he's in his alleged coma), that he will still be able to come back; and in fact be able to do his scheduled concerts and 'Celebrity Apprentice' appearance.
Another observation I would like to note, is that at first the 'Celebrity Apprentice,' show was about being a business person. Then, towards the end, it became about 'who you feel sorriest about.' I have to admit that the fact that, all of a sudden, Michael's daughter had to be tested (in the middle of the show) for diabetes, was a tad suspicious. Then, during the final show, his daughter was magically able to attend. I felt it wasn't fair. Can you imagine Holly, with her special needs son, attending the final event? If you've ever known a child with autism, then you would know that the majority of children diagnosed with a major disorder like that, would not be able to attend a major event like that.
So Bret's gorgeous 'borderline diabetic' (ok how many ppl do we know are 'borderline') daughter somehow shows up (no one asking if Holly's kids want to be there, I mean after all, how many people are tolerant of children (with behavioral issues) attending a big dinner?
I'm just confused. I thought it was about who was the best business person. I mean, after all, Holly won every challenge she was project manager on. And raised the most money, for her charity, in celebrity history
Bret won the majority on sympathy - I didn't know it was a show about who had the biggest sob story.
No comments:
Post a Comment